Tyndall v. Dubois

Per Curiam. This case is controlled by the decision in Washburn v. Gregory Co. supra, page 491, 147 N. W. 706 , or, more correctly speaking, it is controlled by that case as far as the question whether plaintiff’s tax deed covers the mineral rights of *537 defendant Walker is concerned. It is urged that the reservation by Walker gave him no estate in the land, but at most a mere easement. This question is disposed of by Buck v. Walker, 115 Minn. 239 , 132 N. W. 205 , Ann. Cas. 1912D, 882. We are content with the decision in that case, and hold that the mineral interest reserved was land. Judgment affirmed.